Home Page
The spam will not die
Electronic magazines - what is it?
5 most rasprostrannenykh mistakes in marketing search engines.
Calculation of profitability of search promotion
How to make good Internet - shop?
Time problem: lack of interaction of developers and executors
Fundamental problem: how to make the effective project on distance?
In a pursuit of a long banner...
Manner stat`episanija - how to write for a web
Components URL
We mask the IP-address.
Some words about
What is blog?
Give a site chance
Spam. And as with it{him} to struggle
Features of creation of sites: trifles matter!
Features of creation of sites: trifles matter!
Has added WoWeb.ru.
 
Home Links  

Features of creation of sites: trifles matter!

To force the reader to read


The Internet does not provide perfect conditions for reading. To compensate it, we hours invent how to make the maintenance{contents} more convenient for reading: we break the long text into shorter components, we use subtitles to optimize fluent viewing the text, and still we puff over Byzantian krossbrauzernoj site of compatibility to be convinced, that our text is displayed how it is necessary for us.



Useful helps


If you are able to make all this it is simply a shame to ignore such concerning the simple tool as punctuation signs.

The schedule, the spelling and a punctuation are inherently called to provide as much as possible "helps" to an eye of the reader.

Punctuation signs, as well as fonts, have undergone process of natural selection and as a result there were what are really necessary.

The "Bent" inverted commas are bent that at once it was understandable, whether you read the beginning or the end of a phrase, and also partly because they imperceptibly prompt an eye:


” Pass{Miss} unnecessary words “

« Pass{Miss} unnecessary words »


The correct (long) dash also allows an eye to slide free from one part of the offer to another, without the visual "springboard" created by a clumsy double hyphen.


The primitive punctuation looks carelessly and nonprofessionally - so why to not look stylishly?


The primitive punctuation looks carelessly and nonprofessionally - so why to not look stylishly?


In the practical attitude{relation} we, creating sites, should use the best efforts, that eyes of the reader easily slided under the text - the maintenance{contents} from it only wins: it is better perceived.



Question of style


Kehrri the Grant, most stylish of the British gentlemen, warned: « One positive impression create five hundreds fine details ».

Badly made out punctuation distracts attention even from good design of a site is occurs unconsciously, imperceptibly, but during reading collects. The unary stroke instead of an apostrophe and two hyphens instead of one dash is already last century from which it is time grow.



It is time to mature!


Correct the schedule of designers does not give the right on existence to wrong imposition and optimization - the same as good kopirajter or the editor, borrowed{occupied} in creation of sites, will not admit{allow} occurrence in the text of typing errors or grammatic mistakes. And professional founders of sites will not allow, that in their jobs there were subquality work concerning descriptive signs.



Whose hands this job?


In the command of founders of sites usually someone one is responsible for correction of spelling mistakes, but concerning graphic signs - in particular, punctuation, is a business and the designer which does not want to spoil the job, and experts on a content which want to make the text more conveniently for reading-

In general, everyone who in the answer presenting a site in the most favourable light.